By Leon Harris
Published in INsite,
June/July 2002
Aged
Care Providers have a duty of care under both common law and occupational
health and safety legislation to provide for the safety of residents,
staff and visitors. There is a strong relationship between
safety and security. In conjunction with the OH&S legislation,
operators should refer to Australian Standard AS 4485.1 & 2 “Security
for health care facilities”(which includes aged care).
In accordance with AS 4485.1 every organisation shall:
- Undertake an initial security risk assessment to establish what
measures it needs to implement to protect the people and property
for which it has a duty of care;
- Produce evidence of the research undertaken in the security risk
assessment process and evidence that the recommendations of the
security risk assessment have been implemented; and
- Regularly review and revise the policies and procedures developed
as part of the initial process, as required by Section 3 (Assessment
of Security Risks).
Experience has shown criminals can be attracted to an aged care
facility, as they know they are a ‘soft target’by comparison
to other types of locations. Criminals are aware that security
patrols, police response and security hardware by themselves, are
not a substantial threat.
Too often security is reactive, ill-conceived and ad-hoc. It
is well proven that an unprofessional approach to security is usually not a
deterrent to criminals, and often manifests itself as counterproductive,
as it often raises fear of crime levels and increases costs to the
facility. Fear of crime is strongly related to diminished quality
of life for residents and staff. Issues relating to quality
of life impact on the decisions made by residents and their families
with regard to residency options. Fear of crime by staff can
lead to low morale, absenteeism and staff turnover.
Security for residents, staff and assets should be ‘holistic’and
sustainable; anything less may fail to deter criminals and likely
send a negative message to staff.
Some of the areas that need to be examined when assessing security
risks include:
- External influences (neighbourhood)
|
- Security of food preparation areas
|
|
|
|
- Security of (cash & valuables) safe
|
- External lighting (building & internal road/paths,
carparks).
|
- Security of maintenance equipment
|
- Building access (incl. foyer, doors, windows)
|
|
- Security policies & procedures
|
- Protection of residents’belongings
|
|
|
- Storage of medications and drugs
|
|
- Storage of hazardous materials
|
- Contracts & arrangements with security providers
|
Unfortunately, there is too often a mindset that ‘security
is nothing but a cost.’ This is far from the experience
of operators that have positively embraced the need to ensure
that their duty of care obligations are fulfilled. For facility
operators to gain business advantages from their investment in security,
they must go beyond the notion of treating security as a pure obligation
and realign it as part of the core business function. Modern
security risk management knowledge needs to underpin analysis and
strategy.
By maintaining an emphasis on continuous improvement, other benefits
will include a more positive environment and improve the organisation’s
and directors legal defence should any litigation arise out of violence.
Greater understanding and usage of the terms continuous improvement
in security management, security risk management and security
best practice will eventually become second nature to the
modern aged care facility operator. The application of these
terms will greatly assist in the processes towards meeting accreditation
and certification requirements.
Australian Standard AS 4485.1 & 2 and the Australian and New
Zealand Standard on Risk Management AS/NZS 4360:1999 can be obtained
through Standards
Australia.
Leon Harris CPP, is the principal consultant for Harris Crime Prevention
Services.
|