By Leon Harris CPP
Published in ANHECA
NEWS, June 2002
Good
security management is an essential component of the philosophy and
business practices of aged care facilities. One of the common reasons
why management fails to achieve their desired aims in protecting
people in their facility is as basic as poor communication between
staff and management. The decision makers responsible for strategic
security issues need critical information in an organised and timely
manner from staff undertaking their operational duties. Unfortunately,
communication between staff and management is often seriously downgraded
because of poor practices between night shift and 'day time' management.
The following case study illustrates this.
A security review was undertaken of a large aged care facility
that comprised a nursing home and adjoining hostel. The consultant
was advised by management that the nursing home did not have wandering
residents, as they were not in a position to cater for their needs.
Evening staff, however, painted a different picture, advising they
had several residents who often opened external doors and walked
out into the darkened grounds at night. When carrying out their rounds,
staff would sometimes find a resident 'missing', and would leave
the safety of the facility to carry out a search. Staff were concerned
about the possibility of injury from falling over or possible assault
from an intruder.
Also of concern was that the nursing home had a low perimeter gate.
In addition, a retaining wall at the rear of the facility started
at ground level and increased to approximately two metres in height.
The section at ground level provided access along a perimeter fence
to an un-gated driveway and public street. Thus the gate would not
have prevented an able bodied or determined 'wanderer' from walking
out.
When a wanderer incident occurred, the night RN would inform the
morning shift. It was assumed by the night RN that the morning shift
would advise management. Unfortunately the reality was this did not
happen.
When this issue was raised with the DON she could not find any
records where this type of incident had been documented, although
staff had been instructed by memorandum that documentation of this
type of incident was part of their duties.
The management of this facility needed to ask some important questions:
- If there were instructions to staff, why were they not carried
out?
- What happened to the 'verbal' reporting of the incidents; in
other words, why was there a failure to pass on the information
about incidents to management?
- Why did evening/night staff not question the apparent non-action
of management to remedy the 'reported' incidents?
Communication failures relating to security/safety incidents often
result in no remedial action being undertaken by management. As a
result, it strains relations between management and staff, as well
as allowing the risks associated with the security/safety incidents
to continue.
The following list should be considered, but is by no means complete:
- Instructions from management should always be in writing and
incorporated in staff procedures.
- Standardised formal (incident) reporting needs to be established
that will be directed to management for action.
- As with any continuous improvement process, it is important the
originator of the report be provided with feedback as to what action
will be taken to rectify concerns and for all staff to receive
an update in the form of the latest procedures.
- A data base should be developed that will assist in detecting
any trend that may require greater management input or resources.
- In some cases training or workshops for staff may be required.
- Facilities that tend to better overcome communication problems
generated during the night/week-end shift and management appear
to have common characteristics, i.e. a member of their senior management
team on occasions visits the facility during the night and on week-ends
as does the person(s) in charge of staff education/QA.
As a final note, staff training and information should mention
that incident reports may be called upon in legal action involving
an incident It looks poor when incident reports are not available
for court matters.
Leon Harris CPP, is the principal consultant for Harris Crime Prevention
Services.
|