By Leon Harris CPP
Published in INsite,
February/March 2002
Australia
is by no means immune to workplace violence. It is evident when comparing
research undertaken within the health and aged care area and official
crime statistics that workplace violence is largely unreported.
Workplace violence can be described as any incident resulting
in an injury to an employer or employee, whether real or perceived,
from being threatened, abused or assaulted in circumstances relating
to their work.
Violence can be perpetrated from many sources, e.g. a former employee,
a resident, a resident's relative, an estranged spouse (of a staff
member), an intruder in the facility, or within the client's home
environment.
Management often fail to consider the negatives resulting from
workplace violence. Some of these include:
- financial (compensation payouts and legal fees resulting from
civil action);
- business disruption from staff being hospitalised (or worse),
receiving trauma counselling and/or on stress leave;
- poor perception of safety (if people don't feel safe they will
look for a 'safer' workplace). Our research shows that sickies
are sometimes a result of pent up anxiety caused from working in
intimidating workplaces, especially at night;
- organisational image (perception of residents, their families
and the broader marketplace); and
- increase in insurance premiums.
Employers have a statutory and common law duty of care to provide
a safe workplace to employees.
With the many accredited personal injury lawyers advertising a
'no win no fee' policy, management must be aware they are on notice
that should workplace violence eventuate, they are at risk of civil
action. Insurance does not cover the cost of the erosion of relationships
with residents and staff, nor the huge distraction from running the
business.
Compensation awarded to plaintiffs by the courts vary and depend
on the degree of injury, suffering, ongoing medical/psychological
treatment and loss of potential income. A number of recent cases
handed down have resulted in payments of around $750,000. What many
people are not aware of are the numerous claims that are settled
out of court. Some out of court settlements have exceeded this figure.
It is important that management provide leadership and focus in
crime prevention.
There are a number of steps that should be taken to identify and
effectively manage workplace violence.
Step 1 - Identify the Risks
Undertake a security risk assessment that adequately includes issues
of workplace violence. The process must involve discussions with
staff across all shifts, including casuals and agency personnel,
not forgetting those working in isolation, e.g. laundry.
Step 2
- Develop and Implement a Security Risk Action Plan
This must be done in consultation with staff and the outcomes monitored.
A senior person needs to drive the improvement process throughout
the organisation. External expert advice and support may need to
be engaged.
Step 3 - Treat the Risk
Reinforcement strategies should include:
- Issues relating to violence need to be reflected in policies
and procedures relating to safety, security and emergency management.
- Staff should be provided with security policies and
procedures which have been produced in such a way as
to encourage reading.
- Security policies and procedures
should be regularly reviewed
to ensure relevance.
- Workshops
should be
provided
on violence
avoidance
relevant
for each
place of
work.
- Staff
need
to
be
continuously
reminded
that
they
are
also
responsible
for
safety.
- A
system
must
be
in
place
to
enable
staff
to
report incidents,
no
matter
how
trivial.
The
same
system
must
direct management
to
promptly
investigate
incidents
and
provide
feedback
to
staff
reporting incidents.
Step 4
- Monitor and Review
The security risk action plan requires programmed monitoring and
review to ensure relevance and credibility. The monitoring and review
process should be objective and involve employees at all levels.
If this can be achieved, best practice is in sight and duty of care
should be more easily proven.
Organisations should refer to Standards AS/NZS 4360:1999 Risk Management
and AS 3806:1998 Compliance Programs.
Leon Harris CPP, is the principal consultant for Harris Crime Prevention
Services.
|